Modeling the Impact of Land Cover Changes on Soil Erosion Estimation in Yewa North and Yewa South, Ogun State, Nigeria

Authors

  • Lamidi R.B Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI), Nigeria
  • Okonufua E Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI), Nigeria
  • Fakeye A.M Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI), Nigeria
  • Ayegba M.O Nigerian Building and Road Research Institute (NBRRI), Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31695/IJERAT.2020.3638

Keywords:

Urbanization, Land use, Land covers, Landsat Satellite Imageries, RUSLE model

Abstract

Soil erosion is becoming a serious problem in some communities in Yewa North and Yewa South because of rapid land use developments. This study was carried out to analyses the landcover change effects on soil erosion to determine the extent and trend of changes in the study area; estimate and characterize soil loss, and comparing the annual soil loss at different spatial scales. The extent and trend of changes in the landcover were estimated using Landsat Satellite Imageries for the year 2002 and 2017. RUSLE model was used to estimate soil loss and was characterized based on the expert description for tolerable soil loss concept. The results revealed the built-up area showed a consistent increase over time, from 349.5km2 in 2002 to 592km2 in 2017 of the total area. The vegetation covered about 933.4km2 in 2002 but decreased to 509km2 in 2017. Similarly, the area covered by bare ground increased from 243.7km2 in 2002 to 620.4 km2 in 2017 but the waterbody increased from 0.29km2 in 2002 to 0.72km2 in 2017.  The areas covered by agriculture also decreased from 1088.5km2 in 2002 to 894km2 in 2017. The estimated soil loss values ranged from 0 – 420,276 t ha-1 yr-1 with the mean of 231 and standard deviation 2272 in

 2002 while the soil loss estimated in 2017 ranged from 0 – 186,920 t ha/ yr. with the mean of 220 and the standard deviation 1312.3. Comparatively, low erosion is observed in a total area of 45.5% in 2002 and 44.4% in 2017 while extremely severe erosion is observed in a total area of 29.8% in 2002 and 34.3% in 2017 in the study area which matches the actual bareground and agricultural land which can be attributed to change in C and P factors. The study recommended that enlightenment and awareness of erosion control should include land use habit of the people in the agricultural practice and care of vegetation

References

Martı́nez-Casasnovas JA, Sánchez-Bosch I (2000) Impact assessment of changes in land use/conservation practices on soil erosion in the Penedès– Anoia vineyard region (NE Spain). Soil Tillage Res 57: 101-106.

Yang D, Kanae S, Oki T, Koike T, Musiake K (2003) Global potential soil erosion with reference to land use and climate changes. Hydrological processes 17: 2913-2928.

Zare M, Samani AN, Mohammady M, Salmani H, Bazrafshan J (2017) Investigating effects of land use change scenarios on soil erosion using CLUE-s and RUSLE models. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14: 1905-1918.

Ochoa P, Fries A, Mejía D, Burneo J, Ruíz-Sinoga J, et al. (2016) Effects of climate, land cover and topography on soil erosion risk in a semiarid basin of the Andes. Catena 140: 31-42.

Cebecauer T, Hofierka J (2008) The consequences of land-cover changes on soil erosion distribution in Slovakia. Geomorphology 98:187–198

Ofomata, G.E.K. (1984)' Erosion in the forest zone of Nigeria 'A Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of Geographical Association of Nigeria, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.

Feng, X.; Wang, Y.; Chen, L.; Fu, B.; Bai, G. Modeling soil erosion and its response to land-use change in hilly catchments of the Chinese Loess Plateau. Geomorphology 2010, 118, 239–248.

Ranzi, R.; Le, T.H.; Rulli, M.C. A RUSLE approach to model suspended sediment load in the Lo river (Vietnam): Effects of reservoirs and land use changes. J. Hydrus. 2012, 422, 17–29.

Conforti, M.; Buttafuoco, G. Assessing space-time variations of denudation processes and related soil loss from 1955 to 2016 in southern Italy (Calabria region). Environ. Earth Sci. 2017, 76, 457

Wischmeier, W.H., and Smith, D.D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses – A guide to conservation planning.US Department of Agriculture, Science, and Education Administration. Agriculture handbook 537. Washington

Renard, K. G., Foster, G. R., Weesies, G. A., McCool, D., and Yoder, D. (1997). Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning with the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). Agriculture Handbook (Washington) (703

Lee, G.S., and Lee, K.H. (2006). Scaling effect for estimating soil loss in the RUSLE model using remotely sensed geospatial data in Korea. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions 3, 135–157.Korea Water Resource Corporation, 462-1 Jeonmin-dong, Yusung-gu, Daejeon, Korea.

Bizuwerk, A., Taddese, G., and Getahun, Y. (2008) Application of GIS for Modeling Soil Loss Rate in A Wash Basin, Ethiopia. International Livestock Research Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Soo H. T. (2011). Soil Erosion Modeling using RUSLE and GIS on Cameron Highlands, Malaysia for Hydropower Development Published M.Sc. Thesis The School for Renewable Energy Science in affiliation with University of Iceland & University of Akureyri, Akureyri

Mary Ashalata & Raghavaswamy, V. (2000). Remote sensing and GIS-based study on 'Air Quality and Land Use / Cover Hotspot Characterization in Hyderabad City, Andhra Pradesh, India. NNRMS bulletin (B)-25, 30-36

Ramachandran, Kausalya. (2001). Assessment of contamination of Natural Resource using GIS and Remote Sensing – a study of the Hyderabad region. GIS India – Jan - Feb 2001, 8 –13.

Madhavi Lata., Krishna Prasad, K, V., Badarinath, K. V. S., & Raghavaswamy, V. (2004). Measuring urban sprawl: A case study of Hyderabad

Published

2020-10-02

How to Cite

Lamidi R.B, Okonufua E, Fakeye A.M, & Ayegba M.O. (2020). Modeling the Impact of Land Cover Changes on Soil Erosion Estimation in Yewa North and Yewa South, Ogun State, Nigeria. International Journal of Engineering Research and Advanced Technology - IJERAT (ISSN: 2454-6135), 6(10), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31695/IJERAT.2020.3638